What are the environmental conditions for larval Haemonchus contortus to survive?

What are the environmental conditions for larval Haemonchus contortus to survive?

We are searching data for your request:

Forums and discussions:
Manuals and reference books:
Data from registers:
Wait the end of the search in all databases.
Upon completion, a link will appear to access the found materials.

What is known about the environmental limits for Haemonchus contortus to survive outside of a host organism in its larval stages?

I'm interested in knowing:

  • temperature tolerance levels
  • preferred humidity levels
  • pH tolerance
  • how long can it survive outside of the tolerated ranges?

Lowest temperature

2, 3, 4 and 5 week beakers containing eggs and non-infective larvae in lamb faeces didn't develop into infective larvae (L3) when exposed to fluctuating temperatures ranging from -1 to 15°C:

[… ] there were no significant differences in the number of harvested larvae at the different time points for the faeces incubated at 15°C. However, at 5°C and -1 to 15°C no development of eggs occurred, although it was found that a small proportion developed into infective larvae when incubated at 25°C for an extra week. (1)

Highest temperature

Temperature of 40ºC negatively correlated with the survival rates of H. contortus L3. [… ] Decreased motility was observed on day 10 after heating. [… ] Heating of L3 at higher temperatures (45ºC and 50ºC) caused 100% lethality as early on hour 48 and 24 of exposure (2)


When it comes to dessication, there are three main things to take into account:

  • whether the larvae are in exsheathed or ensheathed state matters
  • they can survive several dessication/rehydration cycles
  • it is best survived below freezing temperatures

The experiments on desiccation survival showed that, after a few hours exposure to 47% R.H., all exsheathed larvae died and all ensheathed larvae survived. (3)

Desiccation protected the larvae against death on storage at temperatures below freezing, but it was harmful at temperatures above freezing. (4)

Ruminant larvae were able to survive up to 7 desiccation/rehydration cycles, and, during anhydrobiosis, metabolic activity was decreased and survival of the larvae was prolonged both in the laboratory and in the field. (5)


The effects of temperature on survival and development of the free-living stages of H. contortus have been studied both by faecal and by agar-culture methods. [… ] with a pH range from 6.5 to 8.5 (6)

How long?

As usual, depends on the current environmental variables and current state of the organism and so forth. Read above sections. The article by P. T. Iliev, A. Ivanov, P. Prelezov has a few tables that can give you a good idea of these times (at least for temperature and humidity).

(1) The development and overwintering survival of free-living larvae of Haemonchus contortus in Sweden, K. Troell, P. Waller and J. Höglund

(2) Effects of temperature and dessication on survival rate of Haemonchus contortus infective larval stage, P. T. Iliev, A. Ivanov, P. Prelezov

(3) Desiccation Survival of the Infective Larva of Haemonchus Contortus, C. ELLENBY

(4) Effect of dessication on the survival of infective Haemonchus contortus larvae under laboratory conditions, Kenneth S. Todd, Jr., Norman D. Levine and Paul A. Boatman

(5) Anhydrobiosis increases survival of trichostrongyle nematodes (abstract only), S E Lettini, Michael Sukhdeo

(6) Trends and Perspectives in Parasitology 2 (page 84), B. A. Newton

What are the environmental conditions for larval Haemonchus contortus to survive? - Biology

Several points concerning fecal sample collection warrant further consideration.
1. Fecal pellets may be taken from the rectum or picked up off the ground. An excellent opportunity for sample collection is early in the morning as the animals are leaving their bed-grounds. Fresh samples are easily distinguished from older, weathered droppings.
2. Collect 8 to 10 warm, moist, soft pellets per sample and place them in a sealable plastic bag (to protect against dehydration). Samples should be kept cool (less than 50 degrees F) until analysis. If immediate or same day analysis is not possible, samples may be refrigerated (not frozen) for up to 72 hours.
3. Collect at least 6 individual samples per parasite management unit prior to anthelmintic administration. Management units might be pastures, flocks, separate ranches, etc. Collection of a composite sample, while better than no fecal egg count at all, yields a less accurate assessment of parasite burdens.
4. Early detection of resistance development and evaluation of anthelmintic efficacy involves fecal collections and analysis 7 to 10 days post-treatment. Again, a minimum of 6 samples is suggested.
Post-treatment samples verify product efficacy.
Results of the analysis should be reported in eggs per gram of feces. Need for treatment can be based on the "rules of thumb" listed in Table 2.

Table 2. Treatment Thresholds for Internal Parasites in Sheep and Goats

Time of Year Mature Animals Yearlings and Younger
Spring Greenup - July 4 1000 epg* 500 epg
July 4 - First Frost 2000 epg 1000 epg
*epg = eggs per gram of feces
Egg counts equal to or above these levels warrant anthelmintic administration.

These rules of thumb are not etched in stone for every Texas sheep and goat producer. They are merely benchmarks for producers to use in the development of their specific IPM program. These rules are most applicable to spring lambing/kidding operations. The reasoning behind these guidelines includes:
During spring and early summer, nutrient requirements for ewes and does are high due to lactation, thus tolerance of parasites is less than later in the year when nutrient requirements are lower. In addition, resistance of ewes or does to Haemonchus contortus is weakened at the time of kidding and during early lactation.
Many offspring are weaned and sold by mid-summer. Those remaining in the flock have increased in size and age such that they can tolerate a larger parasite burden.
As a compliment to animal management, another objective of these guidelines is to minimize pasture contamination (tactical treatment) during the early part of the parasite season. The lower thresholds of 500 and 1,000 help to reduce such pasture contamination.
Relative to parasite management, there is nothing significant about July 4 other than it is a midsummer date that is easy to remember.

Development of an effective management plan for Haemonchus contortus involves correctly answering three simple questions:

Question: When do I treat?
Answer: Absolutely implement a strategic, midwinter treatment. Other treatments should be coordinated with pasture management and justified by fecal egg counts.

Question: Which animal do I treat?
Answer: If fecal egg counts or visual observation indicate significant parasite burdens in some animals, all animals in that management group should be treated. Failure to treat animals continues the pasture contamination process, reinfests treated animals, and contributes to resistance development.

Question: What do I use?
Answer: An efficacious product. Rotation among products should be done across groups and not within a group of products (specifically the benzimidazoles). Strategic mid-winter treatments must involve a product labeled for inhibited larvae. Fecal egg counts are the only practical management tool for assessing product efficacy.

Educational programs of the Texas Agricultural Extension Service are open to all people without regard to race, color, sex, disability, religion, age, or national origin.

Issued in furtherance of Cooperative Extension Work in Agriculture and Home Economics, Acts of Congress of May 8, 1914, as amended, and June 30, 1914, in cooperation with the United States Department of Agriculture. Edward A. Hiler, Interim Director, Texas Agricultural Extension Service, The Texas A&M University System.

The information given herein is for educational purposes only. Reference to commercial products or trade names is made with the understanding that no discrimination is intended and no endorsement by the Cooperative Extension Service is implied.

Frank Craddock, Professor and Extension Sheep and Goat Specialist, San Angelo
Rick Machen, Assistant Professor and Extension Livestock Specialist, Uvalde
Tom Craig, Professor, Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, College Station
Tom Fuchs, Professor and Extension Entomologist, San Angelo
The Texas A&M University System.
Original .pdf version produced by Agricultural Communications, The Texas A&M University System


Here, we discovered an endogenous dafachronic acid (DA) in the socioeconomically important parasitic nematode Haemonchus contortus. We demonstrate that DA promotes larval exsheathment and development in this nematode via a relatively conserved nuclear hormone receptor (DAF-12). This stimulatory effect is dose- and time-dependent, and relates to a modulation of dauer-like signalling, and glycerolipid and glycerophospholipid metabolism, likely via a negative feedback loop. Specific chemical inhibition of DAF-9 (cytochrome P450) was shown to significantly reduce the amount of endogenous DA in H. contortus compromise both larval exsheathment and development in vitro and modulate lipid metabolism. Taken together, this evidence shows that DA plays a key functional role in the developmental transition from the free-living to the parasitic stage of H. contortus by modulating the dauer-like signalling pathway and lipid metabolism. Understanding the intricacies of the DA-DAF-12 system and associated networks in H. contortus and related parasitic nematodes could pave the way to new, nematode-specific treatments.


Identifying C. elegans gene homologues in H. contortus

A list of all genes (n = 102) and gene products (n = 182) representing the cGMP, TGF-β and IGF-1 signalling pathways as well as the steroid hormone pathway in C. elegans was established based on published information [16, 39, 45] (Additional file 1: Table S1). The gene and protein sequences, their accession numbers and transcriptomic data were obtained from WormBase (v.WS261). Homologues of these genes were identified by searching (tblastn e-value: ≤ 10 𢄥 ) the C. elegans protein sequences against gene predictions from the latest, published genome and the transcriptomes of H. contortus [28�]. The C. elegans protein sequences were also searched against the H. contortus genome using BLAT v.34 [46] to identify homologues. The gene sequences identified were compared (blastx e-value: ≤ 10 𢄥 ) with C. elegans proteins (PRJNA13758.WS261) to cross-verify their identity.

Gene curation and structural modelling

Genes and transcripts were curated using a recently established method [47]. In brief, the sequences inferred to represent homologues were mapped to the genome assembly of H. contortus using the program BLAT v.34 mapping was displayed using the Integrated Genome Viewer v.2.4.4 (IGV). The mapped transcripts were reassembled using the program CAP3 [48] for possible extensions. The reassembled transcript sequences were mapped to the genome assembly of H. contortus [29], and the corresponding coding DNA sequences (CDS) in the genome were refined using the 𠇌oding2genome” model in the program Exonerate v.2.2.0 [49]. The sequences of curated genes were cross-checked with those of complementary DNAs (cDNAs) for Hc-daf-16, Hc-daf-2 and Hc-pdk-1 [41, 43, 44]. Subsequently, open reading frames (ORFs) were predicted using the program ORF finder [50], and structural and functional domains identified using InterProScan v.61.0 [51, 52]. Pairwise comparisons of inferred amino acid sequences were performed using the program MAFFT v.7.309 [53].

Structural modelling was conducted for a nuclear hormone receptor (DAF-12) using the program I-TASSER [54], following the alignment of amino acid sequence data in MAFFT v.7.309. The alignment was viewed in MView v.1.62 [55]. Models were displayed and compared with available crystal structures [56] using UCSF Chimera v.1.12 [57], and structural similarities between query and template sequences were measured using TM-score and root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) [54]. Biological functions (Gene Ontology, GO) of the modelled protein domain were inferred based on structural similarity.

Transcription analysis

RNA-seq reads (paired-end) from individual developmental stages/sexes of the nematode were mapped to individual curated CDS in the genome using Bowtie v.2.1.0 within the software package RSEM v.1.2.11 [58, 59]. At least 10 reads needed to map to a CDS for transcription to be recorded. Transcription levels of messenger RNAs (mRNAs) were recorded in fragments per kilobase per million mapped reads (FPKM). For individual genes of individual developmental stages of H. contortus, transcription levels were displayed in a heat map using heatmap.2 in an R-language environment (v.3.5.1).

Protein analyses

Proteomic analysis of H. contortus was conducted using an established protocol [31]. In brief, protein sequences predicted from individual homologous genes were used to search mass spectrometric (MS) data representing the egg, L3, L4 (female and male) and adult (female and male) stages of H. contortus using Proteome Discoverer software v.2.0 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose, CA, USA). Peptides were identified using a false discovery rate (FDR) cut-off of < 1% at the peptide and protein levels. Peptide intensities were calculated using Spectronaut software v.11 (Biognosys). At least two peptides needed to match a corresponding protein sequence for expression to be recorded. Peptide intensities were employed to infer the expression levels of individual protein homologues in different developmental stages of H. contortus. A phosphoproteomic analysis of egg, L3, L4 (female and male) and adult (female and male) stages of H. contortus was conducted using an established TiO2 enrichment protocol [60, 61]. Protein sequences encoded by dauer signalling gene homologues were employed to interrogate the phosphoproteomic data using the Proteome Discoverer software. Phosphopeptides were identified using a FDR cut-off of < 1% at the peptide and protein levels. Phosphorylated proteins were mapped to dauer signalling pathways in H. contortus.

The Pathophysiology, Ecology and Epidemiology of Haemonchus contortus Infection in Small Ruminants

  • APA
  • Author
  • Harvard
  • Standard
  • RIS
  • Vancouver

Haemonchus contortus and Haemonchosis – Past, Present and Future Trends. ed. / Robin Gasser Georg von Samson-Himmelstjerna. Academic Press, 2016. p. 95-143 (Advances in Parsitology Vol. 93).

Research output : Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter (peer-reviewed) › peer-review

T1 - The Pathophysiology, Ecology and Epidemiology of Haemonchus contortus Infection in Small Ruminants

N2 - The parasitic nematode Haemonchus contortus occurs commonly in small ruminants, and it is an especially significant threat to the health and production of sheep and goats in tropical and warm temperate zones. The main signs of disease (haemonchosis) relate to its blood-feeding activity, leading to anaemia, weakness and frequently to deaths, unless treatment is provided. Due to the high biotic potential, large burdens of H. contortus may develop rapidly when environmental conditions favour the free-living stages, and deaths may occur with little prior warning. More chronic forms of haemonchosis, resulting in reduced animal production and eventually deaths, occur with smaller persistent infections, especially in situations of prolonged, poor nutrition. The global distribution of the main haemonchosis-endemic zones is consistent with the critical requirements of the egg and larval stages of H. contortus for moisture and moderate to relatively warm temperatures, but the seasonal propensity for hypobiosis (inhibition of the fourth-stage larvae within the host) largely explains the common, though sporadic, outbreaks of haemonchosis in arid and colder environments. The wide climatic distribution may also reflect the adaptation of local isolates to less favourable ecological conditions, while an apparent increase in the prevalence of outbreaks in environments not previously considered endemic for haemonchosis – especially cold, temperate zones – may be attributable to climatic changes. Although the risk of haemonchosis varies considerably on a local level, even where H. contortus is endemic, the extensive range of ecological investigations provides a sound basis for predictions of the relative geographical and seasonal risk in relation to climatic conditions.

AB - The parasitic nematode Haemonchus contortus occurs commonly in small ruminants, and it is an especially significant threat to the health and production of sheep and goats in tropical and warm temperate zones. The main signs of disease (haemonchosis) relate to its blood-feeding activity, leading to anaemia, weakness and frequently to deaths, unless treatment is provided. Due to the high biotic potential, large burdens of H. contortus may develop rapidly when environmental conditions favour the free-living stages, and deaths may occur with little prior warning. More chronic forms of haemonchosis, resulting in reduced animal production and eventually deaths, occur with smaller persistent infections, especially in situations of prolonged, poor nutrition. The global distribution of the main haemonchosis-endemic zones is consistent with the critical requirements of the egg and larval stages of H. contortus for moisture and moderate to relatively warm temperatures, but the seasonal propensity for hypobiosis (inhibition of the fourth-stage larvae within the host) largely explains the common, though sporadic, outbreaks of haemonchosis in arid and colder environments. The wide climatic distribution may also reflect the adaptation of local isolates to less favourable ecological conditions, while an apparent increase in the prevalence of outbreaks in environments not previously considered endemic for haemonchosis – especially cold, temperate zones – may be attributable to climatic changes. Although the risk of haemonchosis varies considerably on a local level, even where H. contortus is endemic, the extensive range of ecological investigations provides a sound basis for predictions of the relative geographical and seasonal risk in relation to climatic conditions.

T3 - Advances in Parsitology

BT - Haemonchus contortus and Haemonchosis – Past, Present and Future Trends

Life cycle

H. contortus passes through six stages of life which include egg, four larval stages, and the adult (El-Ashram and Suo 2017) (Fig. 2). Typical to its family, the female parasite lays numerous eggs with an average (±SE) of 1295.9 ± 280.4 per day which are passed through faeces to pastures (Saccareau et al. 2017). The eggs may die or develop to free-living larval 1st stage (L1), 2nd stage (L2), and infective stage (L3) within 1–7 (Schwarz et al. 2013) days. The hatchability of eggs and development to infective larvae depend upon the availability of suitable environmental conditions (temperature range of 15–37 °C and relative humidity of 85–100%) in faecal pellets and herbage (O’Connor et al. 2006). Stage L3 is ingested by the host where it undergoes ensheathment in the rumen and takes 2–3 weeks to develop into parasitic stage L4. After two moultings and just before the final moult, immature adult L5 erupts which develops a lancet to penetrate the mucosal vessels for sucking blood. The abomasum is the predilection site where the adult worms move freely. The parasite may also undergo arrested inactive phase of development in the host animal during winter called hypobiosis (Zajac and Garza 2020).

Life cycle effect of H. contortus. Eggs hatch to L1 in faeces, L1 moults to L2 in faeces, and eggs passed into faeces

What are the environmental conditions for larval Haemonchus contortus to survive? - Biology

Small ruminants farming is a traditional activity mostly practiced by local populations in developing countries since several centuries. Nowadays, due to many biotic and climatic factors, it faces various problems which damage smallholders&rsquo income especially those related to gastrointestinal parasites. In opposite to the chemical drugs use in controlling those parasites, medicinal plants have been investigated with fewer side effects on both the meat quality and the environment. This current study aimed at reviewing Haemonchus contortus prevalence in small ruminants across the world and present medicinal plants that have been investigated in the last decades. H. contortus is identified as the most significant nematode parasite in small ruminants due to its high prevalence reported by many studies. Its presence in small ruminants results in a loss of feed absorption and disturbance of nutrient metabolism, which lead to poor performance and significant economic loss in the herds, especially in rural areas of developing countries. For the past decades, its control was mainly based on the use of chemical anthelmintics whose use has been limited due to several factors like the irrational and misuse. Recently, the use of medicinal plants has been identified as alternatives methods of its control with conclusive results. Parts of plants or the whole plants of several plant species were reported to be relevant to control H. contortus infection in small ruminants such as: Bridelia ferruginea, Mitragyna inermis, Combretum glutinosum, Hagenia abyssinica, Chenopodium ambrosioides, Leucaena leucocephala, Phytolacca icosandra, Eucalyptus staigeriana, Carica papaya, Newbouldia laevis and Zanthoxylum zanthoxyloïdes.

Key words: Economic losses, gastrointestinal nematodes, chemical anthelmintics, medicinal plants, poor performance.

Abbreviation: BW, Body weight FSA, Faculty of Agronomic Sciences GIN, gastrointestinal nematode/GINs: gastrointestinal nematodes LESA, Laboratory of Ethnopharmacology and Animal Health MP, metabolisable protein UAC, University of Abomey-Calavi WAAPP, West Africa Agricultural Productivity Project.


Small ruminants are essential in subsistence agriculture owing to their exceptional adaptability in difficult environmental conditions. They provide raw materials for the agro-industries and their manure is used as a source of biogas (Adua and Hassan, 2016) and fertilizer for promoting crop production. Additionally, they perform key sociocultural functions that are hardly quantifiable in monetary terms for example, their use for rituals and sacrifices, in or during festivities, and as insurance against poor harvests (Hassan et al., 2013) and are also used for teaching and research. Despite all these benefits, the sector receives little attention and faces various challenges, mainly feed and health problems, particularly those related to gastrointestinal nematodes that are very detrimental to livestock (Hounzangbe-Adote et al., 2005). Haemonchus contortus infections are commonly identified as the most significant (Emery et al., 2016 Jamalm et al., 2016) with significant rates of growth and milk yield reduction in small ruminants in tropical environments leading them to production losses in herds, especially grass-fed small ruminants (Andrea et al., 2011). Several studies carried out in small ruminants revealed the existence of polyparasitism with strongles and prevalence rates of digestive strongyles, especially H. contortus (Salifou, 1996 Attindehou et al., 2012 Adua and Hassan, 2016). As a direct consequence, both the carcass yield of these animals and the income of the small farmers are decreasing. In some areas, particularly in the tropics and subtropics where environmental conditions are ideal for the development and transmission of the nematode parasite, frequent use of synthetic anthelmintics has been successful in solving the problem of nematodes (Knox et al., 2006 Torres-Acosta and Hoste, 2008). In parallel with increasing and not always reasoned use of these chemicals, parasites have become increasingly resistant to anthelmintics. In addition, the high cost, limited availability of these chemicals and the drug residues in final products and the environment following their use are other factors that discourage many farmers from using them in some emerging countries (Knox et al., 2006).

Faced all these challenges, it becomes essential to develop new methods to control parasitism. Indeed, improvement of animal nutrition through feed supplements and the use of medicinal plants have been identified as alternatives adapted to the financial means and socio-cultural environment of the populations (Wabo et al., 2012). Recent studies have revealed the anthelmintic effect of several medicinal plants in the control of gastrointestinal nematodes parasites, especially H. contortus in small ruminants that can be considered when designing parasites control programmes. Therefore, this current study aims to present an overview of the prevalence and the effects of H. contortus on small ruminants&rsquo production (growth and milk production), then to summarize studies conducted on some medicinal plants with anthelmintic properties tested against H. contortus.


Also called the Barber&rsquos pole worm (Brightling, 2006), Haemonchus is a gender of gastrointestinal parasite belonging to the class of Nematodae, the family of Trichostrongylidae and the sub-family of Haemonchinae. The gender counts three species such as: H. contortus, Haemonchus placei and Haemonchus longistipes. H. contortus (Figure 1) has been reported to affect goats, sheep and cattle (Sutherland and Scott, 2010), H. placei affects mostly cattle (Taylor et al., 2007 Sutherland and Scott, 2010) and H. longistipes affects dromedary (Urquhart et al., 1996). H. contortus is the main species of strongle found in small ruminants in tropical areas of Africa, Central America, Southeast Asia and subtropics in Australia and South America (Alowanou, 2016). Measuring about 15 to 30 mm long, an adult H. contortus male is shorter than the female. H. contortus male is characterized by its copulatory bursa formed of two large lateral lobes and a small asymmetrically positioned dorsal lobe (Morales and Pino, 1987). Female parasites have a reddish digestive tube containing ingested blood, spirally surrounded by two white genital cords (Getachew et al., 2007). H. contortus is a hematophagous strongle located in the abomasum of small ruminants. This characteristic leads to a greater pathogenicity compared to other gastrointestinal nematodes (Penicaud, 2007). In fact, as a blood-sucking parasite, it absorbs the blood of the fine capillary vessels of the digestive mucosa of animals, which can cause more or less severe anemias. In addition, the female is extremely active in terms of spawning with excretion of about 5000 to 7000 eggs/day (Coyne and Smith, 1992).

H. contortus is an extremely prolific parasite possessing different strategies for evading unfavorable environmental conditions and immune reactions of the host. Due to its unique ability for producing eggs in large number during its lifetime, H. contortus has an important advantage over other parasites. In that, it can easily contaminate grazing areas and may survive in its hosts through frequent and rapid re-infections. In addition, because the degree of infectivity varies significantly according to the H. contortus isolates, studies concluded on the importance to take in to account the parasite genetic diversity in various agro-ecological zones (Aumont et al., 2003) in all prevention and control measures. These above factors justify its high pathogenicity which is a requirement to the treatment and control of this parasite in small ruminants (Can, 2015) (Figure 1).


The life cycle of a parasite, like every living thing, describes the whole development process of its life which follows a certain pattern designated under the term life cycle. As regards H. contortus, the life cycle is deemed as a direct life cycle which comprise two phases: a parasitic phase that takes place in the host, and a free-living phase that takes place in the external environment (Walken-Brown et al., 2008 Solaiman, 2010) (Figure 2). According to Ballweber (2004), H. contortus life development may generally take 2 to 4 weeks to complete after infection. Walken-Brown et al. (2008) described H. contortus life cycle in seven stages: the egg stage, four larvae stages (L1, L2, L3, and L4), and two adult stages, although the sexually immature adult stages are sometimes named L5. In the development process, the adult female mates with a male and lays the fertile eggs in the digestive tract of the host. Through defecation, those eggs are freely released into the environment by the host. With favorable environmental conditions, the eggs hatch to free-living L1 (Bush et al., 2001 Brightling, 2006), which at their turn, moult to the L2 stage. Both L1 and L2 stages larva feed on bacteria within the host faeces (Walken-Brown et al., 2008). Then, the L2 stage partially changes into the L3 stage, which is unable to feed on bacteria due to its envelope (Bush et al., 2001). So, the amount of energy left after the L2 stage determines the survival of the L3 larvae (Brightling, 2006). The ingestion of the L3 by the host is then necessary to complete their life cycle. Thus, the L3 larvae leaves the faeces, migrates up grass leaves in the pasture, and remains suspended, during the morning dew (Brightling, 2006). After its ingestion by the host, the L3 larvae then changes into L4 that then enters the abomasum mucous of the host to advance into L5 which later becomes sexually mature in the gastrointestinal tract of the host (Walken-Brown et al., 2008). When adults of H. contortus attains maturity, they mate, and begin laying eggs inducing a new cycle.


Many previous studies reported external factors that influence the patterns of H. contortus development. Indeed, temperature, rainfall, humidity and vegetation cover are environmental factors which influence Gastrointestinal Nematodes (GINs) development (Selemon, 2018). El-Ashram et al. (2017), early, had revealed a direct correlation between the harshness of gastrointestinal nematodes problems and rainfall during the wet periods of the year where livestock are raised in the developing countries. Furthermore, Attindehou et al. (2012) also reported, in Benin Republic, a significant association of the haemonchosis rates with the season the minimum and maximum infection rate respectively 36.06% in January (a dry month) and 79.41% July (a very wet month). Definitely, this seasonal trend of prevalence of these parasitic infections will assist in preparing appropriate control strategies, that will be beneficial for goats rearing and industry (Singh et al., 2015). Beside these environmental factors, many other factors have also been reported to influence parasitic infections in small ruminants: the nutrition (Bricarello et al., 2005 Knox et al., 2006), the management practices such as overcrowding, poor management and hygiene (Olanike et al., 2015), the differential management practices (Mandonnet et al., 2003), the drug treatments (Barnes et al., 2001), the genetic factors that provide natural resistance to the host like the breed of host (Chaudary et al., 2007 Saddiqi et al., 2011 Solomon-Wisdom and Matur, 2014 Singh et al., 2015), the age of the host (Solomon-Wisdom et al., 2014 Singh et al., 2015) and the sex of the host (Attindehou et al., 2012 Olanike et al., 2015 Poddar et al., 2017). Contrary to all the above factors, Attindehou et al. (2012) reported no significant difference in relation to animal&rsquos age, origin, sex or species, even if animals less than a year old and especially goats were mostly infected. Finally, both the body weight and reproductive status of the host, according to Tasawar et al. (2010), influence the parasitic infection development due to the development of acquired immunity with gradual increase in weight along with age of the animals.


H. contortus is a serious nematode in small ruminants and has been found as a dominant parasite of goat and sheep among the nematodes (Jamalm et al., 2016). Several parasitological surveys carried out in many regions of Africa have shown convincing results regarding the prevalence of gastrointestinal nematodes in small ruminants&rsquo herds. Indeed, in Benin Republic, 55.56% of the examined animals were infested by H. contortus and the monthly trend of infections showed that in all areas, haemonchosis is endemic with no significant differences in terms of origins or species (Attindehou et al., 2012). According to the same study, the minimum and maximum recorded H. contortus infection rate was respectively of 16.9% in January (a dry month) and 88.7% in July (a very wet month). In Nasarawa State (Nigeria), Adua and Hassan (2016) reported an overall nematodes infection rate of 32.40 and 17.01% in Red Sokoto goats and West African Dwarf goats respectively. According to the same study, the prevalence rate of nematodes infection was 22.45 and 17.82% in Red Sokoto goats while West African Dwarf goats had 14.58 and 8.33% in young and adults respectively. In addition, in the same country, Olanike et al. (2015) reported in Ibadan, 75.85% small ruminants positive for gastrointestinal parasites with the higher prevalence of 54.25% in Red Sokoto breed and the lower prevalence of 21.5% in West African Dwarf breed. According to the results of the same study, 22.75 and 10.5% Red Sokoto and West African Dwarf breeds respectively had mixed helminths (Strongyle spp, Strongyloides spp and Coccidia spp) and protozoa infections (Olanike et al., 2015). In the Plateau region of Togo, Bonfoh et al. (1995) reported a H. contortus prevalence up to 82%. Later, in peri-urban area of Sokodé, in Togo, approximatively the same prevalence rate of gastrointestinal nematodes in small ruminants was recorded (88% represented by Haemonchus sp. and Trichostrongylus sp.) with a negative effect of the season. In a similar way, in urban and peri-urban areas in Maroua, Far North of Cameroon, Ngambia Funkeu et al. (2000) have reported the presence of five species of parasitic nematodes: Haemonchus, Trichostrongylus, Cooperia, Oesophagostomum and Strongyloides papillosus with a predominance of Trichostrongylus and Haemonchus respectively in dry and rainy season. This same study revealed a prevalence of 27 to 31% for these two species depending on the age of the sheep without any significant influence of sex. An epidemiological investigation of small ruminants parasites in the southern forest zone of Ivory Coast carried out by Oka et al. (1999) has revealed a parasite fauna which consisted of nine species of nematodes with a predominance of Trichostrongylus colubriformis (89.7%) and H. contortus (84.1%) in terms of prevalence. Furthermore, in Eastern Ethiopia, Sissay et al. (2007), reported a prevalence of 60% in small ruminants. This is below the results of Mengist et al. (2014) who recorded an overall prevalence of H. contortus of 71.03% with prevalence in sheep and goat up to 67.57 and 71.39% respectively in and around Finoteselam, Ethiopia. According to the same study, the prevalence of haemonchosis was higher in males (73.22%) and adult animals (71.43%). The high rate of prevalence of infection among the goats could be attributed to poor management practices and lack of veterinary services in the area (Osakwe and Anyigor, 2007). A prevalence assessment of H. contortus infections in Goats in Nyagatare District (Rwanda) showed that 75.7% of the small ruminants had H. contortus eggs in faeces with a prevalence rate of 71.8% in goats (Mushonga et al., 2018). Moreover, a 12 months period of survey in the local abattoir of Nyala town, South Darfur State, Sudan revealed 85% of slaughtered goats harbored both adults and immature worms of H. contortus (Abakar, 2002) while an overall prevalence of H. contortus eggs of 12.1% with a 95% CI ranging from 7.97 to 16.23% has been reported in Khartoum State (Sudan) by Boukhari et al. (2016).

Other recent studies conducted on goats in the rest of the world, particularly in Madhya Pradesh (India) concluded that H. contortus was the most predominant parasite followed by Trichostrongylus sp., Oesophagostomum sp., Strongyloides sp. and Bunostomum sp. Of the 960 faecal samples of goats examined, 94.48% were found positive for one or more gastrointestinal parasitism viz., coccidian (82.4%), strongyle (69.27%), amphistomes (22.71%), Strongyloides (9.17%), Trichuris (3.85%), Moniezia (3.02%), Schistosoma (2.29%) and Fasciola sp. 1.77% (Singh et al., 2015). Furthermore, various others studies had earlier reported the high prevalence rates of gastro-intestinal parasites in goats, especially H. contortus, from Indonesia (89.4%) (Widiarso et al., 2018) and different parts of India like 88.23% prevalence of helminthes in Nagpur (Maske et al., 1990), 90.05% from Jabalpur (Lalbiaknungi, 2002), 96% in Tarai region of Uttarakhand (Pant et al., 2009). In Markhor of Chitral Gol National Park, a prevalence rate of 40% of H. contortus has been recorded by Jamalm et al. (2016) against 56-61% prevalence that has been recorded for the parasite in goat in previous studies especially in the Potohar area of Pakistan (Chaudary et al., 2007) and 77.7% Jehangirabad District Khanewal, Punjab, Pakistan recorded by Tasawar et al. (2010). Furthermore, Adhikari et al. (2017) reported a polyparasitism with the higher prevalence for H. contortus of 13.89% in goats of Western Chitwan of Nepal. According to the same study, H. contortus was more prevalent in non-dewormed (40.32%) than in dewormed (5.26%). Finally and in agreement with the previous reports, H. contortus has been reported, in the region of Valle de Lerma (northwestern Argentina), by Suarez et al. (2013) to be the most prevalent nematode species.


Information on the effects of H. contortus infections on small ruminant production mostly concern milk production (both the yield and quality). And even in this context, compared to dairy cows, effects of H. contortus infections on dairy goats and sheep are not well documented. However, several decades ago, while comparing milk yield in ewes orally infected with 2500 H. contortus larvae weekly during pregnancy and lactation, Thomas and Ali (1983) reported a striking weight loss and reduction of sheep milk yield by 23%. This result was then greater than 2.5% to 10% milk yield reduction that had been recorded by Hoste and Chartier (1993) from machine-milked goats infected three times with H. contortus L3 larvae at 50-day intervals. But recent studies have revealed greater reduction rates than these previous ones. Indeed, in Italy, a study involving untreated naturally infected and anthelminthic-treated animals has revealed significantly effect of GINs infections on milk production, with the highest milk yield recorded in the treated goats (Rinaldi et al., 2007). More recently, in Argentina, Suarez et al. (2017) reported a significant difference in the mean total milk production between treated (399.5 L ± 34.0 L) and untreated goats (281.6 L ± 37.5 L), amounting to 41.8% increase in total milk yield. The same study also revealed a post-partum peak in egg count and a negative effect of gastrointestinal nematodes (GINs) on milk yield, even with moderate infections. In addition, studies have gone further by assessing the effects of those GINs infections on the lactation length in small ruminants. Considering milk production of the whole period in naturally infected goats in France, Chartier et al. (2000) r eported a significant effect of GINs infections on the lactation period length with a longer duration of lactation in the high protein diet treated group compared to the group treated with normal protein diet (301.5 vs. 294.9 days) and a similar tendency for the total milk yield. According to Suarez et al. (2009), anthelmintic treatment positively affects the length of the milking period with regard to the length of the milking period of untreated dairy sheep. The same way, Suarez et al. (2017) revealed, in goats instead, a significant negative effect of the GIN infections on the milking period length of the goats after kidding (262.3±9.8 days and 223.3±10.8 days respectively for treated and untreated goats). These different results could explain the positive correlation between the GINs infections treatment and the persistence increase in milk yield in dairy goats, ranging from 7.4 to 18.5% with respect to control values observed by Rinaldi et al. (2007). The same study (Rinaldi et al., 2007) highlighted the deteriorating effect on milk quality caused by nematode infections, when they observed that 29.9% lower fat, 23.3% lower protein and 19.6% lower lactose contents in milk from the untreated goats than that from the control group. However, these finding were not in accordance with Hoste and Chartier (1993) who previously had reported no changes in fat and protein contents between infected and uninfected dairy goats. This might be due to the high level of resistance development in the GINs that occurred more recently in small ruminants herds and reported by several studies in small ruminants (Kaplan and Vidyashankar, 2012 Torres-Acosta et al., 2012b Geurden et al., 2014 Besier et al., 2016). Finally, in Pakistan, Muhammad et al. (2011) estimated the effect of haemonchosis on milk yield and goats weight respectively up to 29 and 27% reduction.

Losses due to H. contortus infections are related to productivity performances, particularly to decrease in body weight that can range from 20 to 60% (Kawano and Yamamura, 2001). These losses could be explained by the loss of appetite (reduction of voluntary feed intake), diarrhoea, anemia and reduced growth (Khan et al., 2008) and disturbance in the nutrient metabolism that cause young H. contortus. In overall, Muhammad et al. (2011) estimated losses due to haemonchosis in sheep and goats at 10-20% reduction of the production.

In disease pathogenesis, anorexia or depression of voluntary feed intake is properly recognized as a critical factor that is capable of revealing largely the response to imbalance of nutrition during gastrointestinal nematodes infection (Sahoo et al., 2011). Even in subclinical infections, anorexia is present (Sykes and Greer, 2003), and may account for around 40 to 90% production losses detected during intestinal parasitism (Greer, 2008). According to Sahoo et al. (2011), in a parasitized animal, anorexia occurrence is as a result of the different factors, viz: a) triggered by the parasite itself for its own advantage b) reduction of voluntary feed intake is aimed at starving the parasites c) in the host, it helps in promoting an effective immune response and d) anorexia affords the host an opportunity to chose diets that minimize infection risk. According to both the nutrient contents of feed offered to parasitized animals and the number of established parasites present, Petkevi?ius (2007) revealed voluntary feed intake reductions varying from 6 to 50% which, according to Greer (2008), could be understood to be the cost of the developing immune response. Feed intake of parasitized animals usually returns toward normality as animals acquire resistance to infection (Sahoo et al., 2011). More recently, on artificial infection with 15 000 third-stage larvae of H. contortus given as three divided doses, Tonin et al. (2014) concluded on progressive degradation of physiological condition weakness, lethargic and pale state and depressed feed intake of crossbred Corriedale lambs.

On the other hand, one of the key features of GINs infection, such as H. contortus infection is an increased loss of endogenous protein into the gastrointestinal tract, partly due to plasma protein leakage and partly because of increased production of muco-protein and sloughing of epithelial cells into the alimentary tract (Petkevi?ius, 2007 Sahoo et al., 2011). A substantial amount of these proteins are redigested before absorbtion at sites distal to infection however, subsequent recycling of digested nutrients would result to additional energy expense by the small ruminants (Knox et al., 2006). The quantity of nutrients reabsorbed endogenously depends on the distal tract (whether there is adequate compensatory absorptive capacity or the lesions position (whether they are in the anterior) (Coop and Kyriazakis, 2001). A proportion that is not resorbed is either further digested in the large intestine or waits to be excreted in the faeces, absorbed as ammonia and excreted as urea in the urine and can therefore constitute a major drain to the infected animals&rsquo overall nitrogen economy (Knox et al., 2006). In parasitized animals, nutrients diversion from production towards specific proteins synthesis for replacement, repair, and reaction to the gut wall damage, to whole blood or plasma loss as well as to mucus production can inflict a significant drain on resources that otherwise would have contributed to fiber, bone, milk and muscle synthesis (Liu et al., 2003 Sahoo et al., 2011). For instance, according to Liu et al. (2003), an additional 17g/day Metabolisable Protein (MP), which is equivalent to 0.57, 0.71, and 0.14 of the MP requirement, is respectively needed for growth, late pregnancy, and early lactation as compensation for losses owing to GINs infection. According to Colditz (2003), GINs adult and larval stages incidence in the gastrointestinal tract leads to inflammation and activation of the acute phase response to infection and occurs locally and systemically. These responses may cause significant drain on the nutritional resources at the disposal of the animals along with protein redirection away from other body processes (Knox et al., 2006).

Finally, the analysis of the situation on the economic plan designates H. contortus as the most economically vital gastrointestinal nematode in its main endemic zones (Perry et al., 2002 Mcleod, 2004) ma inly owing to the common occurrence and potential for substantial rates of mortality in small ruminants. Animal losses vary significantly between seasons, years and regions, contingent on environmental conditions as well as control measures&rsquo effectiveness, including anthelmintic resistance impact (Besier et al., 2016). Although it is difficult to assess the impact of chronic H. contortus infection, and also critically significant in wide grazing situations where routine monitoring is seldom conducted, Muhammad et al. (2011) ascribed considerable loss to the reduced value of animal production. For example, in Australia, gastrointestinal nematodes cost the sheep industry $369 million annually or around 8.7% of its total value (Sackett et al., 2006). All these results revealed the negative interaction between small ruminants and nematode (Hoste et al., 2010), and could justify the fact that, even at moderate burdens, GIN control should not be neglected in small ruminants production.


Use of chemical anthelmintics

Anthelmintics have continued to be the bedrock of many GIN control programmes in grazing animals owing to their ease of use, low cost, and lack of real alternative options (Kenyon and Jackson, 2012). However, in many countries, the resistance of gastrointestinal parasites to chemical anthelmintic is an increasing burden and poses real concern to numerous countries (Kaplan and Vidyashankar, 2012 Torres-Acosta et al., 2012b Geurden et al., 2014). Anthelmintics resistance is an increasing challenge not only in small ruminants (Kaplan and Vidyashankar, 2012) but also in cattle (Cotter et al., 2015) and horses (Nielsen et al., 2014). GINs resistance to the three classes of anthelmintics (macrolytic lactones, nicotinic agonists, and benzimidazoles) has become recurrent globally, since the foremost case of resistance was identified in the early 1960s (Fleming et al., 2006 Kaplan and Vidyashankar, 2012 Cotter et al., 2015). Moreover, in single nematode strains, multiple resistance remains a concern (Taylor et al., 2009 Geurden et al., 2014). Nevertheless, GINs resistance levels against anthelmintics may vary between areas (Torres-Acosta et al., 2012b).

As regards anthelmintic resistance of GIN in goats, since the very first reported cases in different areas of the world like New Zealand (Kettle et al., 1983), Australia (Barton et al., 1985), France (Kerboeuf and Hubert, 1985), this challenge has become globally prevalent as in sheep (Fleming et al., 2006 Jackson et al., 2012 Chandra et al., 2015). In Australia and South America, there is particularly high prevalence however, in Europe there are increasing reports of elevated prevalence (Váradi et al., 2011). Though both goats and sheep are infected with the same nematode species (Hoste et al., 2008), parasites in goats seem to be more resistant to chemical drugs, especially in large flocks characterized by high stocking rates, industrial schemes of production, and frequent treatment based on anthelmintics. Thus, resistance to chemical anthelminthic is assumed to be more frequent in goats&rsquo parasites than in sheep (Váradi et al., 2011). According to Jackson et al. (2012), this low sensitivity to anthelmintics in goats parasites primarily results from difficulties in ascertaining the precise dose of drugs in goats as compared to sheep. A number of anthelmintics are registered for use in sheep, but in goats, they are used off-licence. Thus, goats treatment at the recommended dose rates of sheep led to routine underdosing which reduces the efficacy of the drug used and partly explains the high prevalence of anthelmintic resistance of parasites in goats in comparison with sheep (Hoste et al., 2011).

To retain anthelmintics effectiveness for a prolonged period, a detailed comprehension of the factors that are likely to initiate anthelmintic resistance of GINs is necessary. As a result, there is need for appropriate approaches implementation and development that will slow or impede possible resistance (Leathwick et al., 2015). Resistance development in GINs against anthelmintic may be influenced by many factors, e.g those listed in Table 1.

Alternatives control methods

Elimination of the source of contamination of animals

The purpose of the depletion of the source of contamination is to block the biological cycle of gastrointestinal nematodes (GINs) by controlling the infestation of grazing and thus minimizing the risk of contact between sensitive hosts and L3s larvae (Paolini et al., 2004 Heckendorn, 2007). Various methods of grazing management exist to achieve this goal. These methods are based on three main principles: prevention, evasion and dilution (Pomroy, 2006). Prevention is to put healthy animals on clean pastures (free of L3s) while evasion involves transferring treated animals with anthelmintics from contaminated pastures to clean pastures. Finally, the last principle is to dilute the infestation of grazing.

Improvement of the host resistance

The improvement of the host resistance may be done by two ways: selection of genetically resistant animals and improvement of the host diet.

Selection of genetically resistant animals

The selection of animals resistant to gastrointestinal nematodes (GINs) is a long-standing approach to reduce the use of synthetic anthelmintics (Pomroy, 2006), as such selection would theoretically reduce host infestations and gradually decrease pasture contamination. Genetic variability in GINs resistance has been reported either between breeds or between individuals of the same breed (Bishop and Morris, 2007). Selection of resistant animals may also present some limitations such as the risk of increased host susceptibility to other pathogens (Gruner et al., 1998) or an adverse effect on productivity (Stear and Murray, 1994 Gray, 1997). In addition, these resistant animal selections remain long-term programmes that must take into account local breeding conditions, availability of breeds, and breeding objectives (Pomroy, 2006).

Improvement of the host diet

Gastrointestinal nematodes (GINs) cause severe disruption of digestive physiology and induce an increase in the host's dietary requirements to overcome the strong disturbances of protein and energy metabolism (Hoste et al., 2005). On the basis of this observation, it has been suggested that an improvement in the feed ration to cover the additional needs associated with the presence of nematodes would contribute to improving the host's response to parasitism, particularly when corrections are made. In general, it has been shown that protein metabolism is far more affected by gastrointestinal parasitism than energy metabolism (Coop and Kyriazakis, 1999). As a result, the studies have focused on the benefits of protein supplementation. The notion of

immuno-nutrition has been suggested because improving the diet leads to greater resilience by reducing the consequences of subclinical infestations and improved resistance (Hoste et al., 2008).

Use of medicinal plants

For centuries, medicinal plants and their extracts have been employed in treatment of diseases in man as well as animals (Akhtara et al., 2000 Hounzangbe-Adote et al., 2005 Athanasiadou et al., 2007). Worldwide, anthelmintic resistance occurrence in GIN populations has inspired investigation pertaining to plants and their extracts&rsquo usage as a substitute approach for controlling GINs in ruminants. These medical plants are reasonably inexpensive, generally accepted by small landholders and available locally (Athanasiadou et al., 2007 Hoste et al., 2011). Thus, several review works have already been conducted on use of medicinal plants as a substitutive means for controlling GINs in ruminants (Akhtara et al., 2000 Athanasiadou et al., 2007 Hoste et al., 2011). Table 2 summarizes information on some of these plants that have been used in the recent studies for controlling H. contortus infection in small ruminants.

This current study attempted to provide an overall view about the prevalence and the methods of control of gastrointestinal nematodes parasites, particularly H. contortus. Several previous studies have revealed a high prevalence of H. contortus in small ruminants, and in goats in particular all over the world. Its development is favored by many external factors mainly the climatic factors (temperature, humidity, etc.), management practices. The presence of H. contortus in small ruminants is associated to many problems (weight losses and milk yield reduction) that lead to significant economic losses. Conventional control methods used by farmers during decades are no more adequate to address parasite infections in small ruminants considering their negative impacts on cattle and farmers&rsquo benefits. Medicinal plants with anthelmintic properties have been investigated and can be used as alternatives to chemicals especially for small scale farmers. Knowing, understanding and mastering these alternatives methods might help the small ruminants&rsquo value chain actors to design appropriate control programmes adapted to the financial conditions and geographical area of small scale farmers.

Sources of resistance

The variety of anthelmintic products available to Texas sheep and goat producers is limited. In the US, new product development, relative to the size of its market, is cost prohibitive for pharmaceutical companies. The commercially available dewormers have been used for decades. As such, Haemonchus contortus has developed resistance to all major anthelmintics classes. Most Texas sheep and goat ranches have used a variety of dewormers and methods, so the resistance of Haemonchus to dewormers within these flocks and herds are different.

Several scenarios can result in resistance development. These include:

  1. Insufficient dose: The margin of safety for all approved products is at least twice the recommended dose. Levamisole is the product with the narrowest margin of safety. The dosage selected for all animals should be appropriate for the heaviest animal in that group (grouped by weight). Underdosing might save a few cents in the short term but can be quite costly should resistance develop.
  2. Inappropriate route of administration: Anthelmintics available to livestock producers may be delivered in many forms—oral dose, subcutaneous injection, pour-on, or feed additives. The appropriate method for sheep and goats is oral administration of products designed for oral delivery. In general, injectable and pour-on treatments remain in the system longer but at lower levels. This allows for partially resistant worms to survive that would not have survived a treatment at higher levels.
  3. Ineffective compound: Anthelmintics available to U.S. producers can be divided into three groups according to active ingredient (Table 1). Using an ineffective product is a waste of money and could lead to resistance development. If the efficacy of a product drops below 98 percent, it should no longer be used. If you continue to use a product until efficacy is 50 percent or below, the product will not have value in future product rotations or combination treatments.

Rotations of anthelmintics should not be done during a grazing season unless you are trying to control another parasite or a product is no longer effective. Rotation during a grazing season selects for resistance to all of the drugs in the rotation more rapidly. When rotating products, the appropriate rotation is across classes of compounds (not within a class of compound). For example, rotate from Valbazen to Cydectin to Prohibit, not from Valbazen to Safe-Guard to Panacur.

Combination drenchers (two or more active ingredients) are commercially available in other countries. Mixing 2 drenches together is not recommended, rather, administer two treatments back-to-back. Research indicates that resistance develops slower when two or more active ingredients are used in a single treatment. However, if not used properly, resistance will develop to both products.

  1. Massive reexposure: Deworming animals and returning them to a heavily infested pasture is an exercise in futility. Animals will immediately begin the reinfection process. Animals that were anemic due to a heavy parasite load are not able to fight off new infection, until they have replenished their blood supply and body condition. Grazing management (pasture rotation) is an integral part of an internal parasite management plan. Animals with significant worm burdens can continue to shed viable eggs for several hours or days after you administer an anthelmintic. If possible, hold treated animals in the pen for 48 hours posttreatment and then release them to an uncontaminated pasture. However, this practice selects for a population of parasites that is solely resistant to the product used.
  2. Lack of refugia: Refugia is a population of worms from untreated livestock or wildlife. These worms have a much lower chance of having the genes for resistance. They mate with resistant worms in the abomasum resulting in offspring who have both resistance and susceptibility to anthelmintics. The anthelmintic will only kill the susceptible worms but the numbers removed may prevent disease.

Frequent deworming of all animals rapidly selects for a parasite population that is resistant to the dewormer. It is recommended to intentionally allow sheep and goats to be exposed to parasites that have not had a chance to develop resistance to a dewormer. Most often, this is accomplished by not treating some animals that are low risk for parasitism. These would include animals that do not show signs of parasitism, have a good body condition score, and/or are nonlactating mature animals.


This study demonstrates that infective-stage larvae of 2 trichostrongyle ruminant gastrointestinal nematodes, Haemonchus contortus and Trichostrongylus colubriformis, can enter into anhydrobiotic states when completely desiccated. Larvae of control trichostrongyle species, Heligmosomoides polygyrus and Nippostrongylus brasiliensis, that infect mice were unable to survive desiccation or to enter into anhydrobiosis. Ruminant larvae were able to survive up to 7 desiccation/rehydration cycles, and, during anhydrobiosis, metabolic activity was decreased and survival of the larvae was prolonged both in the laboratory and in the field. Relative humidity had no effect on ruminant larval survival after anhydrobiosis compared with controls. Temperature had a significant effect, 85.8 ± 2.3% of larvae in anhydrobiosis could survive low temperatures (0 C) that killed all control larvae. Metabolic activity, measured by changes in lipid content and CO2 respiration, was significantly lower in larvae that entered anhydrobiosis compared with controls (P < 0.05). In field experiments using open-meshed chambers under ambient environmental conditions, larvae in anhydrobiosis had significantly higher survival rates in the field compared with controls (P < 0.05) during summer and winter trials. These data suggest that anhydrobiosis in ruminant larvae promotes survival at freezing temperatures, decreases metabolic activity, and prolongs survival under natural field conditions.

Analysis of genome-wide SNPs based on 2b-RAD sequencing of pooled samples reveals signature of selection in different populations of Haemonchus contortus

The parasitic nematode Haemonchus contortus is one of the world’s most important parasites of small ruminants that causes significant economic losses to the livestock sector. The population structure and selection in its various strains are poorly understood. No study so far compared its different populations using genome-wide data. Here, we focused on different geographic populations of H. contours from China (Tibet, TB Hubei, HB Inner Mongolia, IM Sichuan, SC), UK and Australia (AS), using genome-wide population-genomic approaches, to explore genetic diversity, population structure and selection. We first performed next-generation high-throughput 2b RAD pool sequencing using Illumina technology, and identified single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in all the strains. We identified 75,187 SNPs for TB, 82,271 for HB, 82,420 for IM, 79,803 for SC, 83,504 for AS and 78,747 for UK strain. The SNPs revealed low-nucleotide diversity (π = 0.0092–0.0133) within each strain, and a significant differentiation level (average Fst = 0.34264) among them. Chinese populations TB and SC, along with the UK strain, were more divergent populations. Chinese populations IM and HB showed affinities to the Australian strain. We then analysed signature of selection and detected 44 (UK) and 03 (AS) private selective sweeps containing 49 and 05 genes, respectively. Finally, we performed the functional annotation of selective sweeps and proposed biological significance to signature of selection. Our data suggest that 2b-RAD pool sequencing can be used to assess the signature of selection in H. contortus.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Watch the video: Barber Pole Worm - Warning For Sheep and Goat Owners (November 2022).